Tuesday, June 30, 2009

@PaulRevere: The what are coming? Is this really you?

Over at #PDF09 (it's a new-media conference), there's lots of hoo-hawing over how world-altering Twitter and other social media are. I agree with all of this, but I have a caveat and a caution.

Caveat: the more possible sources of information, the more face-to-face contact will matter.

Caution: do not confuse your Facebook friends and your Twitter followers with people that will help you when it matters.

See what I mean?

Alec Ross said at PDF09 that Paul Revere would simply have tweeted instead of having to ride. Maybe he's right. But the genius of Revere was not that he communicated, but that the people in so many villages and towns knew him and trusted what he said. And let's not minimize this, either - a tweet is great, but a real man on a real horse riding through your town is a lot more attention-getting, and a lot more mobilizing. Revere wasn't interested in people knowing that the regulars were out, he was interested in people acting on that knowledge.

More timely: Iranians were tweeting and Facebooking and YouTubing like crazy, but the potential for revolution was only made real when they marched.

I believe that we're pushing over a very real threshold here with Twitter and other tools of social media. In most ways, I'm not really qualified to talk about this. I'm a mortgage guy, for Heaven's sake, not a consultant with Radian 6. What I know about Twitter and Facebook and FriendFeed and all that is just what I've observed myself and learned from an admittedly limited experience.

But in another way, I'm well placed for observing the effects of these things. I live in a small town, my office is less than a mile (2 stop signs) away from my home, and my life is interwoven with many of the little businesses that line Main Street. I know people that are well-versed in social media but not integrated into the place they actually live, and others that are ignorant of SM, but who have a vibrant place in the local community. I see the relative power of those personal, physical connections every single day, and with all due respect to Alec Ross, who is a much smarter guy than I am, I think that Paul Revere might still have chosen to ride.

This has lots of business and personal implications. My business is already ephemeral - nobody ever sees any of the money that changes hands in a mortgage transaction - and the electronic media I use for communication can only do so much to advance the relationships that I depend on for referrals. It's certainly easier for people to tweet me or email me a referral, but I've found that it's more likely that they'll give me one on the phone or in person. I become the product my company sells, and raving fans rave more often in the physical presence of the thing they're raving about.

As previously stated, I love Twitter and I'm an evangelist for social media. I think it is immensely powerful. But I do think we're running the risk now of having the engine revving at incredibly high speeds, but the clutch is engaged and the car is not moving. There are scads of information out there, more than ever before, coming at us at an impossible rate, yet our lives, the things we are and do, remain bounded by the same 24 hours and the same willingness - or unwillingness - to act.

Labels: ,

Thursday, June 25, 2009

What Half of the Day Do YOU Work?

@TylerOsby asked a question this morning on Twitter - "how long do you work every day?" Apropos of this, I also read an article this morning by Tim Ferriss, who wrote The 4-Hour Work Week, about how he works, um, 4 hours a week. Obviously. But anyway, what I found was that I could not give a straight answer to Tyler's question. I've had trouble with this for a while, and it's getting worse.

On the surface, it seems simple. You work when you're working, and you aren't working when you're not working. Oh, if only. Here's an example: right now, am I working?

I don't know.

The blog, in general, is a marketing vehicle to let people know that I have a certain level of expertise in mortgages. I do. In fact, I'm very good at them. I've been doing them a long time, in several capacities, and I understand them well from many sides. But the part of this blog that establishes that credibility is primarily the RateWatch segment, which I love, but which this post is not. So is this post work or not?

Um.

There's so much more. In 20 minutes, I'm meeting with Nathan Larsen from Classic Books and Gifts to talk about a really innovative book contest we're putting together. There is practically no chance that this contest will pay me any money, though it is about 90% certain that I'm going to be headmanning it. It will take volumes of time and some money. Is the meeting work? It will be benefitting the bookstore. It will employ (eventually) many people. It has lots of outgrowth possibilities that could make many of the people I know better off. It's also fun. So what is this meeting? Work?

I'm going out to garden at some point today. Is that work? I spent half an hour reading articles this morning and some of those led to this post. Was that work?

I know there's all this fancy talk about balance these days, how to balance your professional and personal life, how to balance family with work, how to keep your different compartments separate and weighing about the same. Perhaps it's just me, but I find that philosophy so stupid my eyes cross. I can't for one second separate all the different parts of my life. Practically no activity that I engage in has no spiritual component. Practically every activity has some family aspect. When I'm with my family, much of the time, my phone is on and on my hip. Am I working? I'm on call. Isn't that working? On the other hand, when I'm sitting in the office, often I'm discussing the Jazz with my brother. Is that working?

Much of what I do every day produces no direct financial benefit. Nearly everything I do EVERY day produces some indirect financial benefit, and the part that doesn't produces other kinds of benefits in friendships, quality of life, larger vegetables, and suchlike. It's not a job, that's for sure. But isn't "work" the thing you add to the universe to stop it from going straight to crap? Am I not ALWAYS working?

I need help here, obviously.

So I told Tyler that my first communication with the outside world happens between 6:30 and 7am, and my last communication between 6pm and 11pm, depending on the day, which was true but not what he asked. He responded that that was a long day. I replied that everyone's day is that long; mine just has more in it than most people's. I got the sense, though, that that wasn't very satisfying to him. It wasn't all the way for me, either.

Can you help?

Labels: , ,

Thursday, June 18, 2009

What to Do When You Lose Your Job

I have a lot of good friends that have lost their jobs recently. Most of these guys are good workers, not at the bottom of the food chain, respectable guys with families and mortgages. They are middle managers, sales managers, warehouse managers, and they weren’t the only ones that went down with the ship - all the people under them lost their jobs as well - but now they’re in varying amounts of trouble and jobs are very, very hard to come by.

Additionally, I know a goodly number of people in my industry that are underemployed now, with the real estate market in disarray. Mortgage guys, title guys, Realtors, lots of us find ourselves with stretches of time and nothing in particular to do with them.

I have a suggestion. You lost your job. But you haven’t lost your ability. You can still work. Right now, there’s a lot of work out there. Why not do some of it?

First, let’s split jobs from work, so that this will make sense. A job I’ll define as something someone pays you to do. Obviously, we need to eat and we have mortgages to pay, so jobs are definitely attractive. I’m not disputing that. Work is anything you do that is productive, whether it pays or not. It therefore includes things like gardening and playing with children.

Second, let’s think about this a bit. We have no job. Nobody is going to pay us today to do anything. We’re going to apply for some jobs, send out our resumes, make some calls to our networks, try to find an open position. Guess what? There aren’t any. If there were open positions, we wouldn’t have had ours get eliminated (simplistic, obviously, but in general terms, when large chunks of the economy are firing, there aren’t going to be any open positions by definition). So resume fairs and Monster.com will only be so effective. It’s unlikely that we’ll find anything immediately, and even less likely that we’ll immediately find a job we want.

But we can still work. The economy is shrinking. Why is this? Do people need less food than they once did? Fewer cars? They only wear clothes half the time now? No, of course not. But there are two ways to stimulate the economy. One is to have people out there with money, looking to buy things. That’s where we once were, but the debt fairy has come for payment now, and the days of lots of free cash are over. The other is to supply things to the market that people will decide to re-task their money to buy. This is called supply-side economics, and it works a bit differently than we’re used to. But it still works.

Look, nobody stood around trying to figure out if there was something like a Rubik’s Cube to buy. Erno Rubik produced it, and people said “hey, that’s cool” and bought them up. What I’m suggesting is something like that. You want a job. There are no jobs. But if businesses were doing better, there would be jobs. So what you need is for businesses to be doing better.

How do businesses do better? They sell more things, produce more things. To do that, they need more workers, more ideas. They’re cutting costs to try to stay in business, but what they desperately need is a reason to hire people. They need work done, and they can’t pay for it until they get some money.

So make them some money.

We have incredible expertise. If you’ve been in management anywhere, you know how to do things, how to sell, how to buy, how to get people working together. Lots of the guys I know that are out of work are salesmen and marketers. They have huge amounts of experience, probably a lot more than most businesses could afford to pay them for.

So we don’t have jobs. We can still do work.

I work with a small group of people called the Main Street Gang, for want of a better name. What we do is go from business to business, mostly on Main Street in Lehi Utah, meeting the proprietors, looking for ways we can help. Sometimes we write reviews of their businesses and post them around on local sites, doing some web marketing. Sometimes the help we offer is more substantive. With the local bookstore, we had an idea that has now grown into a large enterprise, and has, it appears, some real potential. It should be very good for the struggling bookstore, and for several other related businesses.

There’s a local organic market. They need help. There’s a barbershop. It needs help. An appraisal management company. An insurance agency. My mortgage branch. A sign company. A restaurant. All these businesses could profit tremendously from the expertise that we can bring to the table. We can organize campaigns, consult, see areas where things could be improved. We come in as a consulting company and we do what we can to help. And we do it for free, because someone needs to do it, and the people that need it the most can afford it the least.

It doesn’t pay. It is, however, productive work. It makes us better. It keeps us sharp. It brings us into contact with dozens of small businessmen and women, the very people that are most likely to feel the returning surge of power in the economy and look to hire someone to help them to exploit it. Who are they most likely to look at first? Some of us have gotten jobs in the meantime, and still return to help out once in a while. When a job comes open where one of us is working, who are we most likely to recommend to the HR people? Right - someone we’ve worked with before, that we know and trust, and that has already demonstrated his willingness to work even when the payoff was pretty obscure.

We supply work and expertise and energy. We still have those things. We try to push the flywheel of the economy a bit faster on every turn. And we find that we’re happier. We’re having fun. We’re stopping a few people from joining us in the ranks of the un- and under-employed. So if you’re out there, having trouble finding a job, how about joining us? We could use you.

Now that you don’t have a job, why not do the work you always wanted to do? It just might be the best career move you ever made.

Labels:

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

It's a Start for the Main Street Gang

Lehi Utah is my home on purpose. I grew up outside Washington DC in a sprawling suburb, but spent a lot of time in the city and got to know it pretty well. I like cities. They’re fun. I’ve been to most of the big ones in the US (with the sole exception, I think, of Houston), and I like the unique character of each. Except Cleveland, but that’s another story.

But a city isn’t a big mass of people. A city is a very large conglomeration of smaller communities, that all happen to be in close proximity. Nobody knows “Manhattan”, no matter how long he’s lived there. He knows his deli, his bookstore, his side of the street. The ones that love New York the hardest are the ones that know their neighbors the best. Those are the people that build communities. The people I admire most are the ones that start making friends with the locals fifteen minutes after arriving.

Contrary to generally accepted ideas, this kind of community is just as possible - and just as critical - in Manhattan as it is in Lehi. In small towns, it’s easier to get to know the locals because those are the only people there, but smart people, those that are the most fun to be around, get to know the locals wherever local is. Maybe that’s harder when the local coffee shop is Starbucks instead of Beans and Brews, and the local burger joint is Burger King instead of Emmetts, but I wonder.

Most of you know that I am a relentless advocate for local business. I love small business in whatever locale, no matter how small. I have been known to drop a $20 bill on a lemonade stand. When I moved to Lehi about 5 years ago, it was the smallest city I had ever lived in by some hundred thousand people. I loved it immediately. I started shopping at Kohlers instead of Albertsons. I joined the Chamber of Commerce and got an immediate tour of historic Lehi from Carl Mellor, who runs the 120-year-old Lehi Hotel. I ate at Porter’s Place. It felt like home.

But I noticed that that wasn’t universal. Lehi was in the process of tripling in size over an 8-year period, and there was a lot of new housing going up with people in it that used Lehi like a hotel; they slept here and ate room service, but went to work somewhere else and generally took entertainment and meals in other cities. Part of that is Lehi’s fault - there is now a movie theater in town, but there wasn’t until recently, and the number of restaurants is tiny - and part of that is just bad luck, with the main arterial road in town being owned not by the city but by the state of Utah (hence largely unimprovable). The Home Depot in American Fork killed off Peck’s Hardware on Lehi’s State Street, and the WalMart and Lowe’s and Costco seemed poised to do the same to other local businesses, such as they were. I worried that Lehi would fail to maintain its character in the face of this chain-store onslaught. Worse, I feared that Lehi would lose its sense of community, the ties that bind people together with the places they live.

Let me add parenthetically that I love big business as well as small business. I shop at these chain stores, too (though not nearly as often as I used to). I have nothing against WalMart and Lowe’s, Applebee’s and Chili’s. This is not a rant against globalism and multi-national corporations. Far from it. I have, however, something else in mind. Money spent in your local community stays there far more surely than money spent in a chain store. It’s a more efficient delivery vehicle for value. If you want your local city to provide services, your local stores to thrive, and your local housing market to retain (or increase) its value, the best way to do that is to inject your money into the local economy, and you do that much more efficiently at Broadbent’s General Store than at WalMart (see the 3/50 Project for more). It’s not just good for the local business owners; it’s good for you.

So I moved my business to Main Street. I’d have gladly bought a building - almost did, though thank goodness I was denied the loan (the building later collapsed) - but I settled for renting the place at 60 West. That’s the address. 60 West Main. No suite number. No floor number. Heck, there’s only one room in the building, unless you count the bathroom. We all work in the one area, no walls, no cubicles.

Then I wanted to find a group of people that was committed to local business. Not just “yeah, we like it”, but “I stayed awake all night thinking of how to get more people to go to your store”. I wanted people around that were desperate to make a Lehi community. I had Jonathan Heaton and his excellent insurance agency. And Olivia Votaw of Girl With Red Lipstick. And Amy Jo Yates, a longtime friend. And for a long time, they was it.

So we decided to start knocking doors. Since then I’ve met Mark Wilson in the architect’s office next door (he’ll be the Lehi Rotary Club President in about two weeks), and Sebastian moved in one door farther down about a year ago with his sign company. Jonathan and his excellent insurance agency went in with me to also rent the building at 68 West, just next door. I met Bob Trepanier, who’s run Porter’s Place for a generation, and Charlie and Sterling, who put Charlie Boys’ Carolina BBQ in the cottage a couple doors down (get the beans). Then Nathan and Daniela Larsen put Classic Books and Gifts in on the corner, Lehi’s first and only bookstore. Pam Mayfield, one block down, cuts my hair in the Lehi Old Town Barber’s (look for the barber pole; if it’s twirling, she’s in). Fire Chief Dale Ekins (another Rotarian) owns the Pioneer Party and Copy, then there’s the Lehi Bakery (legendary square donuts). There’s Carl at the Lehi Historic Hotel (now the Rockwell Hotel), and down another block is Flowers on Main and the incredible James and Kris Belcher. That’s what we call the sunny side of the street.

On the shady side there’s Dave Lym’s insurance agency, and next door to him Pastor Chuck runs the Timp Baptist Church. There’s the Bridal Shop there that has been in that spot for almost 100 years. To the east, Emmett’s makes the best food in town (as long as you like burgers) and Ethel’s is the ice cream shop (real hard ice cream!). That place can give you heart failure if you don’t watch it. But just today, Allison’s Organics opened Lehi’s first organic market (between the tattoo parlor and the karate studio), so now we have some balance.

There’s something started here on Main Street. There’s a group here now that wants to see Lehi become something better, both what it used to be, and what it always wanted to be but never was. I’m just a Lehi Utah mortgage guy, and just one guy at that. Things aren’t so rosy out there for any of us. The economy is huge and much more powerful than I am. I don’t know how big a difference I can make.

But I’m encouraged by the last few weeks. There are only a few of us. But it’s a start. And we believe.

P.S. If I forgot you, you’ll have to remind me in the comments. I tried to get everyone, but again, I’m just a guy. And if you didn’t know that the Main Street Gang existed, if you didn’t know that anyone was organizing this kind of “Shop Lehi First” effort (kudos to Local First Utah as well for their work in this area), well, now you know. Join us (chris@lehilender.com, or tweet me @chrisjoneslehi).

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

RateWatch - Glimmer of Hope?

Market: Still a drift downwards, but that drift has abated some and there appears not to be any strong force pushing bonds lower. The S&P continues to be unable to break through the 944 level, and there is bad economic news on the way, according to many sources. Add Fed buying to the mix, and we could see rates move a bit lower over the next month or so.
Analysis: Comment out of John Hancock is that bad economic news coupled with the expected Fed announcement on June 23rd of increased Fed buying of bonds will cause rates on mortgages to move lower in the 3rd quarter. Here's hoping. It is true that the subprime loan resets are mostly behind us now, which is causing the market to stabilize, but it is also true that the resets in Option ARMs are mostly still ahead of us, and those have a much larger capital volume than what we've gone through so far. Some are predicting another two yeras before the clouds begin to break in financial markets.
Personally, I think if you are prepared you shall not fear. Let us all get prepared then, shall we?

Cj
www.lehilender.com